Not being ‘a bit normal’

by Caroline Smailes on August 16, 2009

Anyone who was following me on twitter last night (because that’s where I spend my wild Saturday evenings), would have seen that I was struggling with a short story (yes, the same short story that was making me lose the will to live on Facebook last week).

I decided a few weeks ago that I’d enter a short story competition and that I’d write a story especially for that competition. I’d decided that it was to be set in a specific location and contain a character that I had wanted to develop, but for the past few weeks I’ve been really struggling to write the story. It’s all felt so false. Last night, I finally finished the story but straight away I was hit with an anxious niggle. I knew that the story wasn’t ‘me’. It just didn’t ‘feel right’, it didn’t ‘fit’. I knew that I’d written it with an audience in mind, an artificial audience, trying to second guess what a judge would want and assuming that the answer was something truly commercial and not at all experimental. The story I’d written was lacking the ‘something’ that excites me.

Last night, I made G read the story. He’s ridiculously honest, obviously knows my style inside out and he does it for a living. He finished, looked up at me and said something about how it was ‘a bit normal’ for me. Of course, I tried to resist the urge to stamp my feet and asked him to explain to me what he thought was wrong with the story. His answer was basically that the story simply wasn’t me. And I know that he’s right because in trying to second guess and to conform to an imaginary reader, who clearly hated my natural style, I’d realised that I’d been forcing words out. So, after G suggested that I turn it all around and write it all over again, I did and I have. I swear, it was suddenly so easy, I mean effortless. 1,500 words in less than an hour. The same story, a different voice, the voice that needed to come out and clearly it was just such a relief to be ‘given permission’ to write what I wanted to write.

Today I’ve been through it all again, checking dialogue consistencies, making sure there weren’t any rogue full stops (!), or paragraphs(!) and I’ve ended up with a monologue, something that I am sure has flaws, but at least it’s something that I can feel proud to have written. And, if the judges hate my story, then that’s ok too (and probable as I am Marmite after all), because I’ve got something else to add to my portfolio and I’ve created a character who is begging to be written into novel 4. But you never know, someone might just ‘get it’, fingers crossed and a bit of fairy dust…

So clearly by now you’ll be seeking the point to and of this post… well all of this struggling to write a short story malarkey, well it’s reminded me just how In Search of Adam will always be the freest thing that I’ll ever write. There was a disregard for an audience, a spilling out of a story and an honesty that has made people love or hate it. In the publishing world where sales figures can break a career there is the temptation to try and second guess readership and the constantly changing marketplace, but really a fiction writer should just write the words that are inside, the ones that need to come out and then worry about everything else later.

(Or maybe I’m just an idealistic fool?)

{ 20 comments… read them below or add one }

Nik Perring August 16, 2009 at 6:48 pm

Well done G. Sounds brilliant! (And makes me happy!)

Nik

Reply

Caroline Smailes August 16, 2009 at 6:54 pm

You now how much hassle it’s been causing me! I ended up taking a scene out of the bigger one and twisting it all around to monologue from dialogue. Short story writing to a restricted word count is soooo hard :) x

Reply

Alison Wells August 17, 2009 at 7:35 am

Yeah, this is really interesting. This year I’ve been focussing on short stories and getting a different sense with each story whether its ‘me’ or not. As a relative newcomer I am ‘finding my voice’ and knowing, as you say, if something ‘niggles’ or ‘feels false’. I’ve also written for an audience and when I reread later the story seems dead. It’s great to hear that you cracked the story and the breakthrough was that you followed the feeling of yourself, that undercurrent that says ‘Yes!’. Good luck with the competition, it’ll find its home either there or somewhere later, because it’ll stay alive well into the future.

Reply

DJ Kirkby August 16, 2009 at 6:54 pm

Ooooh I want to read it! And, not being able to read it this instant is making me want to stamp my feet…

Reply

Caroline Smailes August 16, 2009 at 9:29 pm

bless, you are lovely! I might keep it for when novel 4 comes out and that’s like ages away…

Reply

Julia Skinner August 16, 2009 at 6:54 pm

‘…but really a fiction writer should just write the words that are inside, the ones that need to come out and then worry about everything else later’..absolutely! That’s what makes you the writer you are. Who wants to be normal & anyway, what’s normal?!!:)

Reply

Tam August 16, 2009 at 7:26 pm

Normal has its place (somewhere) but you should never try to be something you’re not. Not that I’m saying you’re not normal, in a lot of ways you are. I think what I mean is that you are not ordinary, which means you must be extraordinary. And that is a Very Good Thing.

Reply

Stephen Shieber August 16, 2009 at 9:12 pm

To conform to any rules is something I take my hat off to. As a writer, I find it nearly impossible to do. Good for you, going back to your voice, whether people want it or not. Cliches are true: ‘to thine own self be true.’

Reply

RKCharron August 16, 2009 at 9:38 pm

Hi :)
I’m glad you re-wrote the story to be true to your inner-voice.
That’s the best way to write.
Thanks for sharing, and I hope to hear you won that competition, but even if you don’t you’ve won back your integrity.
Looking forward to reading it sometime in the future.
Love and best wishes to you & Bubblecow,
RKCharron
xoxo

Reply

Caroline Smailes August 16, 2009 at 9:44 pm

I never ever win anything, never have and never will… but I do now have a story that I really am proud of, as it was quite a challenge. Thanks for your lovely comment. x

Reply

Caroline Smailes August 16, 2009 at 9:43 pm

Julia Skinner - ‘That’s what makes you the writer you are.’ - thank you! Hopefully more like you will understand and ‘get’ what I’m trying to do.

Tam - thank you, it’s very nice of you to be so lovely. I guess the probelm for anyone who writes like me is finding the right people to listen and to buy and to want to read on. It’s a crazy marketplace and I have no idea what is waiting around the corner. I guess I only get so many ’shots’.

Stephen Shieber - I think I have authority issues, if the truth be told! :)

xxx

Reply

Beth August 16, 2009 at 10:59 pm

I’m glad it came out right in the end. You are You and you are Just Right How You Are. And I hate marmite (yeurch) but love you. So there you go :)

Reply

Debs Carr August 17, 2009 at 9:13 am

So pleased that you ended up writing your story in the way you needed to. I can’t imagine that someone wouldn’t appreciate your writing.

Best of luck with the competition.

Reply

Carol August 17, 2009 at 9:59 am

You already have an audience hon….write for those of us that loved ISOA and that like our reading material a little bit different :-)

Good luck

C x

Reply

Darren Jones August 17, 2009 at 10:11 am

I really like photography. I take loads of photos of our children and pets, and some landscape shots too. “Normal” photos have their place - they provide an accurate record of who was where, doing what, with whom, and when - but they rarely excite. Extraordinary pictures are the ones that make me feel proud and great, but are quite often the ones other people treat as Marmite! Musicians, painters, writers, actors - if it’s art for art’s sake then how do you make a living? I wonder why you think you’ll never again have the freedom you enjoyed writing In Search of Adam?

Reply

Caroline Smailes August 17, 2009 at 10:22 am

I’ve looked at some of your photography and it’s so beautiful. Maybe what you class as ‘normal’ is far from my view of ‘normal photography’. To have a skilled photographer’s eye can never be normal. You see beauty, you see colours and art in a flash, in a quick moment of reaction, you see what I could only imagine.

I don’t think that I’ll ever have the absolute freedom that I had when I wrote In Search of Adam because I was selfish, I had a disregard for those who I may hurt or confuse. Don’t get me wrong, I am so proud of Adam, it was something that needed to be written, but when I wrote it I didn’t think that it would ever be published. It was a spilling out in a pure form. Now when I write, I am aware that people close to me will be reading my work and my instinct is to protect. I love writing, really love writing, but now I know that I can’t write out some of the things inside that I’d quite like too. One day, when I’m a bit older and my circumstances are different, then I probably will have that sense of freedom again.

I love that art connects, so many people continue with their art and hope that one day the right people will see/hear/read and connect. It’s what drives us, that hope. Hope that makes sense :)

Reply

Caroline Smailes August 17, 2009 at 10:25 am

Beth - thank you! :)

Debs Carr - cross your fingers for me, please.

Carol - you are very lovely! I still can’t believe that people actually read my writing. That really is cray talk, isn’t it? x

Reply

Captain Black August 17, 2009 at 10:30 am

Sod normal, I’ve always been a fan of Marmite anyway. Good luck!

Reply

Kathryn Lang August 17, 2009 at 2:43 pm

“anxious niggle” made me smile - I love that phrase.

Normal is so over rated. Write a story that draws the reader into an experience - including you when you read your own work.

Reply

Caroline Smailes August 18, 2009 at 4:43 pm

Captain Black - thank you, young man!

Kathryn Lang - sage advice!

x

Reply

Leave a Comment